Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Willingdon Golf Club
Sponsored by
Southdown Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 9AA
Tel 01323 410981
 
 
Monday, 1st December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Incinerator contract is questioned



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 August 2008
SEAFORD MP Norman Baker has written to the auditor of East Sussex County Council's accounts, demanding a formal investigation is launched into the way in which the contract for the controversial incinerator at Newhaven has been handled.
Formally objecting to the county council's accounts, Mr Baker raised several areas of concern over the council's waste management contract, including:

n The contract terms which he believes may prevent national targets for recycling being met – Ke
nt County Council is losing £1 million a year because of its obligation to send materials for incineration that could be recycled.

n A concern that East Sussex County Council may not be able to compel Veolia to export a specific volume of electricity from the plant. The council has always maintained that the incinerator is an 'energy from waste' facility.

n The question of who has control over the selection of materials for recycling.

n The question of who regulates the contracts between Veolia and the purchasers of recyclates, and whether or not the county council will be getting best value from the sales.

n Asking why the county council has acquired a lease of 50 years for the incinerator site, when the contract with Veolia runs for only 25 years.

Mr Baker said, "I have always been very concerned about the proposals to build an incinerator in Newhaven.

"However, what I find equally concerning is the manner in which the county council has gone about securing the waste management contract with Veolia.

"There appear to be many areas in which, on inspection, it has to be asked whether or not the council has succeeded in obtaining value for public money.

"I have formally written to the auditor of the county council's accounts, and have requested that an investigation take place, in order that the actions of the council with regards to the contract be open to independent scrutiny.

"So far this incinerator has only succeeded in burning money rather than waste."

A spokesperson for the county council said, "This contract has been closely scrunitised by a number of parties and we are confident that the auditor will confirm that we have followed all the correct procedures.

"We have secured a contract that is value for money, and what is more, will provide effective waste management, including recycling and composting for the county for many years to come."



The full article contains 396 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 August 2008 3:57 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Eastbourne
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Michael Ryan,

Shrewsbury 25/08/2008 13:23:02
Why do Friends of the Earth ignore the research by Dr Dick van Steenis & myself?

The Hounslow Chronicle article "Baby death rates soar", of 21 Augsut 2008, is one of many that have appeared which could have been used by FoE to sink incinerator proposals.

Maybe someone in FoE will care to comment on their silence?

Kind regards,

Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.